Review

The Birds

The Birds

Director
Alfred Hitchcock
Year
1963
Rating
3.5 stars
Reviewed by
Gon Curiel a.k.a. Groucho
Review date
Tuesday, August 17, 2004

Some Alfred Hitchcock fans call Psycho (1960) his definitive masterpiece, others don’t, but most agree that it’s his last great film. After it, most of his six final efforts were either unmemorable or, quite sadly, completely forgettable; but there is one, Psycho’s follow-up, which redeems Hitchcock’s last films from forgetfulness, and that one is The Birds.

However, to some, calling The Birds anything less than a masterpiece of the horror genre is a blasphemy, and it is indeed magnificent, but never to the lengths of Psycho. Then again, it’s as good in setting its horror pieces and having the audience on the edge of their seats at all times!

The story, scripted by Evan Hunter from a story by Daphne Du Maurier, begins in San Francisco, and has Melanie Daniels (Tippi Hedren, in her film debut), a carefree socialite with a bizarre taste for jokes, meeting Mitch Brenner (Rod Taylor) in a pet shop, and developing a peculiar attraction towards him. After pretending she’s an employee at the store, which leads to Mitch playing a prank on her too, she decides to stretch the joke as far as the coastal town of Bodega Bay, where he spends the weekends.

Ever since the first scene, birds show a strange behavior, which only gets worse as the film advances. As if these occurrences were actually following Melanie, they get much worse in Bodega Bay, and also seem to surround her. The first attack comes when a gull strikes Melanie directly, which is how she ends up in Mitch’s home, along with his mother Lydia (Jessica Tandy) and his little sister Cathy (Veronica Cartwright). Though the latter becomes very fond of their guest, Lydia doesn’t quite trust her, which is why the visitor prefers to stay at the home of Annie Hayworth (Suzanne Pleshette), a local teacher she met on the way, who has her own history with Mitch.

Unfortunately, birds begin to attack people more and more. At their worst, gulls and crows and other sorts of birds strike in groups, beyond any possible explanation. Hitchcock is sure to terrorize the viewer as much through the attacks as he does through the tension of Melanie’s presence in a town where she’s not welcome or trusted; Lydia’s distrust extends to the townspeople who relate Melanie to the attacks.

Despite the interesting psychological aspects of the story (and some comical ones, in the best early Hitchcock tradition), and the fine cast, the attacks take first chair and are amazingly realized. The visual effects and the staging of actual birds are uncanny. The complete lack of music gives the film an eerie touch of reality, and one of the scariest scenes happens indoors, with birds trying to penetrate from outside. But it’s the fact that we don’t get any explanation that makes the experience actually terrifying and unforgettable; a triumph of psychological horror. The day after I watched the film for the last time, a huge bird flew right next to my car while I was driving, and I got the impulse to change lanes, getting away from it. It’s that scary.

In my opinion, this isn’t first-rate Hitchcock… but it comes pretty darn close.

“Why are they doing this? Why are they doing this?!”

Gon C Curiel en Twitter | CriticSociety en Twitter | CriticSociety en Facebook

Share on Facebook | Share on Twitter

Permalink

Comments

Get your permanent avatar at Gravatar.com Mithrandir wrote at 9/6/2004 9:13:04 PM:

"Psycho" is Hitchcock at his best. "The birds" is Hitchcock, in my opinion, at his second best. I watched this movie, as I did with "Psycho" with a sense of fear and that is very unusual for me. I believe that horror, at it's best, isn't when the director shows gore and blood and a masked man chasing running teens at a very slow speed, only to catch up with them seconds later. True horror and fear comes from the mind, the psychological fear. This movie, at its best, does that and much more.

The main surprise for me while watching these films in particular is how easily scared I get. I had the notion that the older the movie was, the worst. No special effects, no big sound effects, no CGI. Oh, how wrong can someone be. My favorite horror movie of all times is still, to this day, Psycho. Hitchcock is a God in my book when it comes to this.

There are still movies I would like to watch of the horror genre that I believe I would like. Nosferatus is one of them. The 1958 version of Dracula, with Christopher Lee is also on that list (I have so much respect for this man is not even funny).

All in all, its an amazing movie. Everyone should watch it and appreciate the wonders of it.

P.S: If anyone wants to download/read the script for this movie, go here: http://www.screentalk.biz/hitchcock.htm . Its in PDF format.

Get your permanent avatar at Gravatar.com Groucho wrote at 9/6/2004 10:12:08 PM:

Amen!!

Get your permanent avatar at Gravatar.com Mithrandir wrote at 9/7/2004 1:35:59 PM:

Thanks for replying :)

Get your permanent avatar at Gravatar.com Groucho wrote at 9/7/2004 5:21:22 PM:

Thank YOU!! I wish everyone gave Hitchcock classics a chance. Even though they're highly popular, many people don't really know most of them. So I was very excited with your reply.

New comments are temporarily disabled